Nov 162009

Who am I? Why am I here?

Who am I? Why am I here?

“Everything rises and falls on leadership.”

I do not know who said that first. I first heard it from a preacher named Lee Roberson, back in the seventies. Then, John Maxwell popularized it in more recent memory. Whoever said it, said it right.

All you can really add to it is, “Amen.”

The Dallas Cowboys are a team in desperate need of a leader. Plenty of players have emerged as positive locker room and field leaders, not the least of which is Keith Brooking. But the dearth of leadership on the sideline is ominous and distressing to the Cowboys faithful.

Last weekend, before the Green Bay game, my wife and I went to dinner with her parents. For my father-in-law and me, the subject turned, as it often does, to the Dallas Cowboys. We were talking about this very subject: the dreadful state of the head coaching position.

Coming off that huge win in Philly, my father-in-law was optimistic and hopeful.

“You know, Gene,” he said, “They don’t really have a head coach. They have an offensive and a defensive coordinator.”

I said that they do have a head coach. His name is Jerry.

He agreed.

He said he thought the team was mature enough and had enough team leaders to compensate for Wade Phillips’ lack of leadership. I said I hoped he was right, but I rather doubted it.

After Sunday’s debacle, he called and said, “I was wrong.”

Now, I do think he is right about being wrong. But I wish he wasn’t.

All of this got me thinking. I wondered who were the worst coaches ever to win a Super Bowl? I thought I would list the five worst Super Bowl winning coaches of all time.

That is a tough assignment. I only came up with two candidates I felt worthy to fill the five slots. But I will fill them anyway.

  1. Don McCafferty won Super Bowl V with the Baltimore Colts. He only served as a head coach in the league for four years, posting a 28-17-2 record (a .600 winning percentage). Baltimore fired him five games into the 1972 season, just two years after he won his ring. His team was 1-4 at the time of his firing.
  2. Barry Switzer is number two on my list, but could get serious consideration for number one. The legendary coach of the Oklahoma Sooners may have proved Jerry Jones right when Jones said, “Any of five hundred coaches could have won a Super Bowl with this team.” Jones said that as he was firing Jimmy Johnson. Barry won Super Bowl XXX with the Cowboys. He was fired by Jones two years later, after his team went 6-10. Switzer’s record as a head coach: 40-24 (a .630 winning percentage).
  3. Brian Billick coached the Baltimore Ravens from 1999 – 2007. He posted four winning seasons and won Super Bowl XXXV. He also built one of the league’s all-time best defenses, with more than a little help from one Ray Lewis. He had a record of 80-64 (a .560 winning percentage).
  4. Mike Ditka posted a winning record in seven of his 14 years as a head coach. His Chicago Bears destroyed New England in Super Bowl XX, 46-10 on the strength of one of the greatest defenses ever to take an NFL field. Ditka’s record as a head coach was 121-95 (a .560 winning percentage).
  5. Jon Gruden won Super Bowl XXXVII with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. In 11 years coaching the Raiders and Bucs, he posted a 95-81 record.

As you can see, even a list of the “weakest” Super Bowl-winning coaches gets pretty strong after you get past those first two slots. I doubt many would call Billick, Ditka, or Gruden “bad” head coaches.

So how does Phillips measure up? Through the 2009 season, he had posted a 76-52 regular season record (a .594 winning percentage). The rub comes, however, in the post-season, where he is 0-4.

The problem with Wade Phillips is not his regular season coaching record. The problem is his laissezfaire approach to leadership. The problem is his penchant for over-celebrating minor victories and down-playing major losses. The problem is his tendency to become defensive, when he should become determined. The problem is that he is not now, nor has he ever been, the head coach of the Dallas Cowboys.

I just don’t see any way for that not to matter.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2009 Silver and BlueBlood
Gene Strother (414 Posts)

Gene has been an avid Dallas Cowboys fan for nearly five decades, which amounts to just about his entire life. The only time he was not a Cowboys fan was that brief period at the beginning of his life, when he didn't have all his baby teeth and could not yet say "Cowboys." As soon as quit slobbering, he started hollering, "Go Cowboys!"


I think Wade Phillips is one of those people for whom the consolation prize is not such a bad thing. I agree that it doesn't necessarily take a rah-rah.. in your face personality to succeed as a head coach in the NFL. It does take a guy who will never take solace in statistics and who will never wallow in self-pity or offer excuses.

If the coach is always ready, after every loss, with a list of "things we beat them on;" if he has his "I am proud of the way we...." speech prepared; if he is satisfied with just trying real hard and losing; then, the tone is set for the team, and so are the expectations.

Wade has proven himself a fine defensive coordinator. However, not every great soldier makes a great General. NFL history is replete with examples of the Peter Principle at work.

I SO agree on the confusion with Jerry. He is driven and determined and committed. He just won't set ego aside until it is absolutely necessary (see Parcells).

jessie simon
jessie simon

Wow! All I can say is. Amen!

I'm curious of your take. Football is a tough sport and often tough coaches are successful working with tough men. I happen to like tough coaches. I'd love Bill Cower on the Cowboy sideline. But, I don't think it’s a lack of "toughness" that is the problem with Wade. Tough, doesn't equal disciplined, focused, inspiring, persuasive, trusted. Tony Dungee and Tom Laundry, among others, weren't total jerks as leaders but they had the above list in spades.

I think you nailed it with... "The problem is his laissez-faire approach to leadership. The problem is his penchant for over-celebrating minor victories and down-playing major losses. The problem is his tendency to become defensive, when he should become determined."

He doesn't even seem to want to take charge and hold people accountable for their performance. He seems to be the chief encourager and excuse maker. Which is great if you’re signing up friends… but we need a head coach for a professional football team.

I don’t get it. Would a person as successful as Jerry Jones allow people on a team he was in charge of to get by with what Wade allows the people on his team to get by with? Would Jerry have tolerated the same level of performance in the people who built the stadium as Wade allows on the field? Can you build that stadium walking around telling everyone that answers to you “almost”, “good try”, "ya dang near got that roof to work", "we will just have to wait and see if the scoreboard lights up cause ya never know", "We will just do our best, try and build it and hope it works out" "????

I just don’t get why Jerry allows in his head coaches what I can’t imagine him allowing in the team if he were actually the Head Coach. He just confuses me.

%d bloggers like this: